Laika AI
Last Updated
May 6, 2026

Nokia is executing a deliberate pivot away from its identity as a legacy telecom hardware manufacturer, repositioning itself as a serious contender in AI infrastructure and defense technology, a transition that analysts believe could unlock a significant revaluation of the stock if the company can successfully shed the perception problem that has followed it since its mobile phone era.
Nokia's stock is currently trading at approximately $13.4, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 26. That valuation sits in an awkward middle ground that reflects the market's uncertainty about which category the company belongs to as its transformation progresses.
The reference point that has historically anchored Nokia's valuation is Ericsson, its closest peer in telecom equipment, which trades at a PE of 17. That comparison has historically kept a ceiling on how the market prices Nokia, because investors comparing the two have tended to apply a similar multiple to both businesses. As Nokia moves away from pure telecom equipment and deeper into optical infrastructure and AI-adjacent technology, that Ericsson comparison becomes less relevant, and a new set of comparables comes into view.
Ciena, a pure-play optical networking company, trades at a PE of 216. Arista Networks, which has established itself as a critical infrastructure provider for AI data center buildouts, trades at 54. If Nokia's business mix continues to shift toward these categories and the market begins to reprice it accordingly, even alignment with the lower end of Arista's multiple would imply a stock price of approximately $26.8, a near-doubling from current levels. That potential rerating is the thesis that a growing number of Nokia watchers are beginning to examine seriously.
One of the most concrete expressions of Nokia's transformation is the growth of its defense-facing operations. Nokia Federal Solutions, a dedicated branch focused on serving the US government, has been building relationships and capabilities that position the company as a technology provider to defense and intelligence clients rather than simply a commercial network equipment vendor.
No comments yet. Be the first!
The strategic logic behind this pivot is straightforward. Defense customers operating in environments that require secure, resilient, and high-performance communications infrastructure are natural buyers of the kind of advanced networking technology that Nokia has developed through its telecom work. 5G and AI capabilities that have commercial applications in enterprise and carrier networks translate directly into capabilities that defense clients need for battlefield communications, secure data transmission, and intelligence infrastructure.
Nokia has formalized this direction through partnerships with Lockheed Martin and NVIDIA, two of the most significant names in defense technology and AI hardware, respectively. The Lockheed Martin relationship opens doors to defense prime contractor ecosystems where Nokia's networking technology can be embedded into larger defense platform programs. The NVIDIA partnership positions Nokia within the AI infrastructure stack at the hardware level, connecting its optical and radio access network capabilities to the GPU compute infrastructure that is driving the current wave of AI deployment.
Beyond the defense pivot, Nokia's most ambitious forward-looking initiative is its work in AI-RAN, which stands for AI Radio Access Network. Traditional radio access networks handle the physical layer of mobile communications, managing the transmission of signals between user devices and the broader network. AI-RAN integrates machine learning directly into that layer, enabling the network to optimize its own performance in real time based on traffic patterns, interference conditions, and user behavior.
As the global race to dominate AI infrastructure intensifies across chip manufacturers and network providers alike, Nokia's AI-RAN initiative positions it as a foundational supplier at the radio access layer, a segment of the stack that has so far received less attention than data center compute but carries equal long-term strategic significance.
The commercial implications of a successful AI-RAN product are substantial. If Nokia can establish itself as a foundational provider of AI-native radio access infrastructure, the revenue model shifts from one-time hardware sales toward a recurring software and services dynamic that more closely resembles cloud monetization than traditional telecom equipment supply. That structural change in revenue character, from lumpy hardware to recurring software, is exactly the kind of business model transformation that commands premium valuation multiples in the current market environment.
Adding a further dimension to Nokia's forward trajectory is the anticipated development and eventual commercial rollout of 6G technology. Nokia has been active in 6G research and standardization discussions, positioning itself to be among the companies that shape the technical architecture of the next generation of wireless infrastructure.
The 6G timeline remains long, with commercial deployments not expected until the early 2030s at the earliest in most industry projections. However, the early positioning work that occurs during the research and standardization phase determines which companies are architecturally embedded in 6G infrastructure when it arrives. Nokia's existing presence in 5G network deployments globally gives it a foundation from which to participate credibly in 6G development, and its AI-RAN work creates a potential pathway for AI-native capabilities to be designed into 6G architecture from the ground up rather than retrofitted later.
The most significant non-technical challenge Nokia faces in its transformation is the perception problem that its history creates among investors. For a substantial portion of the investment community, Nokia remains primarily associated with its former identity as a mobile handset manufacturer, a business it exited years ago, but which continues to influence how many investors instinctively think about the company and its prospects.
That legacy perception creates a valuation drag that operates independently of Nokia's actual current business. Investors evaluating Nokia alongside peers like Arista or Ciena need to look past that legacy framing and assess the company on the merits of its current and forward business mix. For those who do, the valuation gap becomes a potential opportunity, particularly for investors whose trades are structured around identifying re-rating catalysts in technology stocks before the broader market reprices them.
The degree to which Nokia can accelerate that perception change among institutional investors will be as important to the revaluation thesis as the technical and commercial execution of its AI and defense strategy.
Nokia's transformation thesis is coherent, and the strategic moves it has made, including the NVIDIA partnership, Nokia Federal Solutions, and AI-RAN development, point in a consistent direction. What the market is waiting for is execution evidence at the revenue and margin level that confirms the strategic narrative is translating into financial outcomes.
Sustained communication of the transformation story alongside quarterly results that demonstrate a genuine business mix shift will be the combination that ultimately closes the gap between Nokia's current PE of 26 and the AI infrastructure multiples it is targeting. Until that evidence accumulates, the stock remains a transition-phase investment where patience and conviction in the long-term thesis are the primary requirements from investors who choose to engage with it.